We performed a comparison between Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition and Tidal Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition is praised for its strong job definition capabilities, providing users with a wide range of options for constructing jobs. Tidal Automation is highly regarded for its exceptional job scheduling capabilities. Additionally, Tidal Automation offers a single pane of glass interface that makes it easier for users to manage and monitor workloads.
The users mentioned areas of improvement for Redwood including reporting features, monitoring and alert service, user interface, machine learning capabilities, and customer support. Tidal could benefit from improvements in the graphical user interface, pricing model, user interface intuitiveness, cloud/hybrid solution, reporting capabilities, and integration options.
Service and Support: Customers have generally positive experiences with Redwood Software's customer service, although there is potential for improvement. Tidal Automation's customer service receives high praise for being responsive, knowledgeable, and exceeding expectations. However, some customers mention that lower-priority items may occasionally be overlooked.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Redwood was difficult and took a lot of time, while Tidal Automation had a simple and straightforward setup. Redwood needed training for multiple teams and dealing with a decentralized structure, whereas Tidal only needed a few servers and a database. Redwood received mixed feedback on ease of understanding, while Tidal had useful documentation.
Pricing: Redwood Software has a higher setup cost compared to Tidal Automation. However, users find it worth the expense because of its valuable features and user framework. Redwood's pricing is notably lower than Control-M and UC4. Tidal Automation offers fair and predictable pricing, delivering good value in terms of functionality and support.
ROI: Redwood Software does not provide specific metrics on ROI. Tidal Automation has shown to bring cost savings, increased efficiency, and productivity for customers. Tidal Automation also offers reduced manual work, improved risk management, and integration capabilities.
Comparison Results: Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition outperforms Tidal Automation. Redwood Software offers more advanced features, including robust job definition and building capabilities, error-handling capabilities, and integration with diverse systems.
"There are various ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your business needs and requirements."
"This tool helps us to monitor the job related to SAP modules."
"We can create and test micro-workflows to find defects sooner."
"We can achieve anything that anything that we would like to do. In SAP, it's not generally possible with just with SAP. So we have solution manager as an option, but run by job."
"Installing and configuring Redwood agents are easy, and scheduling jobs on Redwood helps in triggering the batches as per business requirements."
"This program works with every browser."
"In Redwood Automation, we can easily fetch the daily reports from the system as per the client's requirement and track the status of every job which is running, aborted, or canceled."
"The automated alert response is very useful for long-running and failed jobs during off-business hours."
"One of the most useful features is being able to set up a schedule and create dependencies. The calendar can kick off processes at certain times, based on dependencies that you specify, like time, or whether another process has finished. Dependencies are the most useful thing."
"Tidal Workload Automation Software provides the ability to quickly adapt to changing business requirements."
"It is intended to enable large-scale automation environments, making it appropriate for companies with complicated processes and big data volumes."
"Tidal Automation is very efficient and can quickly automate most manual and repetitive tasks."
"For us, the calendaring system is very robust. Some of the teams have very specific requests for when they need jobs to run. That's been really valuable, because a lot of times, when people run scripts, if they run on a holiday, they're going to fail... A couple of times a month it probably saves us work and the necessity of logging in from home and checking to make sure everything's okay."
"Thinking of all the people involved in checking jobs on a daily basis, manually running jobs or auditing them through standalone tools, and trying to connect them. We have saved hundreds of hours weekly, which is substantial."
"The best feature is that it allows task scheduling based on particular occurrences, like the receipt of files, database updates, or system notifications."
"With the varied features in the varied adapters provided, we use Tidal Enterprise Scheduler because we want everything to be scheduled in one place. Tidal provides that for us with its tools and varying platforms in our organization. Tidal provides all the connectors to the platforms. This is very useful because we don't want to look for another scheduler for scheduling certain jobs. We don't want to look at those schedules manually between platforms."
"We'd like to see an integration with ServiceNow to raise the tickets/incidents in ServiceNow."
"Currently, our developers aren't able to access their own objects in the user acceptance testing server and production system server as they are assigned the developer access role, which is kind of a solid role, and no changes or additions can be made to it."
"Redwood Software has a high price tag, especially for small and medium-sized businesses that might not have the funds to engage in a complete automation system."
"We need the automatic creation of incidents for failed jobs."
"The addition of machine learning capabilities could help Redwood Workload Automation Software better predict job and workflow performance, detect anomalies, and optimize operations based on historical data."
"Adding machine learning and AI capabilities would enable Redwood to automate more complex business processes and tasks."
"The price wise, it is not affordable. When we compare with other industry leading softwares and even the same scale, there are certain softwares that can compete with Redwood, but Redwood is very highly paced.So it is more SAP friendly, I would say, at this point. Since it was owned by SAP for very long time, they have made it SAP friendly. But if you look at the tool as a enterprise tool. Like, in general, it is not really that great as a tool. So you can you have better options when you couple it with SAP. But if you would like to control your enterprise level applications, anything after that, like, Azure AWS and things like that Oracle."
"They should be made more cost-effective in comparison to similar software services."
"I don't know if Tidal wants to get into the business of monitoring long-running jobs, but that could be a feature for the future: a job launching and monitoring tool. Using Tidal for monitoring doesn't seem like a good fit, but if they could offer something that did that as an add-on or include it, it might be helpful."
"When we patch to the next version, there is often a little thing that breaks. It has rarely been a big deal, but I always seem to have to follow up on one tiny issue. It would help if they had some better QA testing of their patches."
"The product’s UI is outdated. They should work on this particular area."
"Tidal Software interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly."
"Some users have complained that the initial setup process is complicated and time-consuming, while others have suggested that the software could offer more freedom in customizing processes."
"From an administrative point of view, I wouldn't give really high marks to the solution. I actually entertained getting the JAWS application at one point. One of the shortcomings with the scheduler is the reporting capabilities. At least at the time, JAWS was the best that they had for a third-party integration. I think they've got things in the pipeline to help alleviate that gap."
"Understanding and using Tidal Automation could be overwhelming for someone with minimal programming language."
"There are several improvement points that our team has provided to the vendor."
Redwood RunMyJobs is ranked 3rd in Workload Automation with 30 reviews while Tidal by Redwood is ranked 2nd in Workload Automation with 37 reviews. Redwood RunMyJobs is rated 9.6, while Tidal by Redwood is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Redwood RunMyJobs writes "Simple to use, increases CPU speed, and reduces the cost of machine time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tidal by Redwood writes "Great visibility with a single pane of glass and a low learning curve". Redwood RunMyJobs is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation and ActiveBatch by Redwood, whereas Tidal by Redwood is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, ActiveBatch by Redwood and Rocket Zeke. See our Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Tidal by Redwood report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
