We performed a comparison between RiskOptics ROAR Platform and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."We can get all the information about all the applications in a single platform."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"The solution has improved my organization by having everything combined to a single platform."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"I have found all the features to be valuable, including those involving reporting, the dashboard, notifications, email modules, the database and data input."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"The most valuable feature is the enterprise module, which provides the capability of having all of the information stored and linked with everything else."
"The last project was for an investment group that was using Excel. Shifting their records from one position to another took approximately 15 minutes. In Archer, we created a workflow for them to leverage it, and they could send the single record with one click to one person within seconds. The whole process went from 15 minutes to two minutes to get the approval for the records. The main purpose of Archer is to just make it easy."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"After you change and save the pre-filled specific information at the end of an application page, the application will again take you to the top of the page."
"Performance could be improved."
"It's resource-hungry, that's the best way of putting it."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"Slow turnaround time from support team."
"Solution could use more inbuilt applications."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
"The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you have to scroll or type elsewhere and copy-paste it. It's very inconvenient."
"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."
RiskOptics ROAR Platform is ranked 12th in GRC with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. RiskOptics ROAR Platform is rated 9.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RiskOptics ROAR Platform writes "Acts as a software inventory of applications in an environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". RiskOptics ROAR Platform is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.