We performed a comparison between RSA Archer and SAI360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."Flexible record permissions and data import features."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"With RSA Archer, an admin can set permissions for a normal user to go directly to the tool they need to input some data. Admins can then go through that and approve some requests. Also, they can log in based on these kinds of permissions, including ticketing, service patches, or upgrades."
"Makes auditing much more convenient."
"Even non-technical people can be masters of the product."
"The most valuable features are the advanced workflow and the dashboards. This tool can present data wonderfully to management, and it is easy for them to manage the risk plans."
"Archer has simplified our security audits. It's made it easier to raise and trigger questionnaires to customers."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"The technology's a little outdated."
"There are some issues with the interface for version 6.5 but these may already be repaired and simplified in the new versions that have been released."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."
"Some of the error reporting isn't very clear. When you're looking for information on error codes, you got to do a lot of digging."
"Performance could be improved."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
"If the product is used in a small organization, it doesn't work well."
RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews while SAI360 is ranked 11th in GRC with 1 review. RSA Archer is rated 8.0, while SAI360 is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAI360 writes "Offers a reasonable amount of ROI and helps save costs". RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk, whereas SAI360 is most compared with .
See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.