We performed a comparison between Sage MAS and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product provides consistent updates and upgrades."
"The technical support is very good."
"S4HANA is a completely integrated solution. It's an end-to-end ERP system with strong manufacturing and financial integration, which is not common among ERPs. And it's a solution that's driven by industry best practices."
"A user-friendly UI with good documentation."
"The solution's most valuable features are performance and processes."
"One of the most valuable features is the in-memory database."
"The finance solution and procurement functionalities are good."
"I like the user experience and usability of SAP Fiori, which is one of the main features that we are using."
"The most valuable feature is the perfect end-to-end integration."
"It is a very powerful, highly customizable tool."
"We're definitely looking at a new system because everything in this product needs improving."
"The vendor stopped supporting the solution on the Linux platform."
"The solution could be more user-friendly for regular users and developers."
"An area for improvement would be integration with different kinds of legacies. In the next release, I would like the product to be prepared for blockchain technology and the best way to communicate with social networking."
"I have found the solution to be stable but it could improve."
"The cost of the solution is quite high. It needs to be adjusted."
"If S4HANA has more AI and machine learning, it will be better and easier for reporting and dashboarding."
"If I can highlight one point that could be improved, when we talk about other ERPs, like Oracle, nowadays these ERPs provide free integration with other ERPs. For example, there is an API for banks integrated into every tool and every product form requires that bank integration in order to give real time data into the ERP. But SAP is charging a lot for that particular bank integration scenario and I think it should be free because other ERPs are providing this feature built in to the ERP. People always ask us about the integration and how much it will cost to go with that solution, so people are thinking about this."
"There should be an easier way to migrate customers from all versions to SAP S/4HANA."
"S/4HANA could be improved with better integration. At the moment, a main issue I see is that there's so much growth in the functionality, complementary modules, and cloud solutions which were acquired by SAP and which extend the functionality of the SAP ERP suite. It looks to me that they tend to acquire more and more functionality from acquisitions, but they don't invest enough effort into making them integrated with S/4HANA or ERP. I would say that the functionality is great, but integration is something which still needs more attention. Instead of focusing on acquisitions, they should invest, integrate, and better the existing portfolio of products in SAP. It would help us, as implementors, to have a more complex or compact solution."
Sage MAS is ranked 22nd in ERP with 3 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. Sage MAS is rated 6.6, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Sage MAS writes "The product is easy to use and provides consistent updates and upgrades". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". Sage MAS is most compared with SAP ERP, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. See our SAP S/4HANA vs. Sage MAS report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.