We performed a comparison between Secureworks Taegis XDR and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."My clients like Defender's file integrity monitoring. They're monitoring Windows and Linux system files."
"Email protection is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Defender XDR."
"Microsoft Defender XDR is scalable."
"The common and advanced security policies for threat hunting and blocking attacks are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of all is the full integration with the rest of the software in the operating system and Office 365, as well as Microsoft SCCM. It is quite easy for us to work with the whole instance of Microsoft products. This integration improves the benefits of the whole suite of products."
"The most valuable features are spam filtering, attachment filtering, and antivirus protection."
"I like that it's stable. It's been stable for a long time, and Microsoft Defender has done a good job there."
"The best feature is probably the alert generation. When I do a security reset, the other session triggers instantly from the Defender console, and I can work on it. The policies are three times, but they are also ready to install it."
"It's a complete solution package."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"Wazuh's most beneficial features for our security needs are flexibility, built-in rules, integration capabilities, and documentation."
"I find the PCI DSS feature the most valuable, along with the feature that monitors the compliance of Windows and the CIS benchmarks on other devices like Unix or Linux systems."
"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."
"It's stable."
"The product is easy to customize."
"Wazuh's logging features integrate seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services. There are also Wazuh agent configurations for different use cases, like vulnerability scanning, host-based intrusion detection, and file integrity monitoring."
"The MITRE ATT&CK correlation is most valuable."
"My company implemented Wazuh because it was relatively inexpensive. They could quickly get their hands on it to check a box for some audit and compliance."
"Since all of our databases are updated and located in the cloud, I would like additional support for this."
"Offboarding latency should be reduced. Even after a device has been successfully offboarded using a particular offboarding script, it still shows up as onboarded."
"The capability to not only thwart attacks but also to adapt to evolving threats is crucial."
"There are other SIEM solutions that are easier to use, mainly based on the creation of rules, use cases, and groups."
"At times, there may be delays in the execution of certain actions and their effects."
"The dashboard should be easier to use. There is also improvement needed in the reporting when it comes to exporting or scheduling reports."
"Customers say they want absolutely seamless integration between other Microsoft solutions and Defender XDR, including the ability to change device settings within the Defender portal. They need to contact the IT team responsible for the device management tools to change some settings. They would prefer that those changes be initiated directly from the Defender portal or applied from Intune without involving the IT operations team."
"It would be beneficial to have a more seamless experience with everything consolidated in one place, particularly when dealing with aspects related to the Exchange console."
"The pricing could be improved."
"We found limitations in the XDR's detections, lacking the ability to create customized detection and log parsing rules."
"The computing resources are consuming and do not make sense."
"The tool doesn't detect anomalies or new environments."
"We would like to see more improvements on the cloud."
"Wazuh should come up with more in-built rules and integrations for the cloud."
"A more structured approach, perhaps with modular UI components, to facilitate easier integration and navigation within the Wazuh platform for custom integrations would be beneficial."
"Wazuh needs more security and features, particularly visualization features and a health monitor."
"I think that the next release should be more suitable for large enterprises, because currently they are not because large companies do not rely on open source solutions."
"Wazuh has a drawback with regard to Unix systems. The solution does not allow us to do real-time monitoring for Unix systems. If usage increases, it would be a heavy fall on the other SIEM solutions or event monitoring solutions."
Secureworks Taegis XDR is ranked 28th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 2 reviews while Wazuh is ranked 3rd in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 38 reviews. Secureworks Taegis XDR is rated 6.0, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Secureworks Taegis XDR writes " It's a complete solution package". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". Secureworks Taegis XDR is most compared with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, IBM Security QRadar and LogRhythm UEBA, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, AlienVault OSSIM, Splunk Enterprise Security and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our Secureworks Taegis XDR vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
