We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."
"The interface is fine."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"Users get confused between VPR and CVSS ratings."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.