We performed a comparison between Varonis Platform and Securonix Next-Gen SIEM based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Varonis Platform is great at monitoring and analyzing user behavior, and also offers automation of data management tasks. On the other hand, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM's Spotter feature allows for intensive research and separation of violations by top violators, and UEBA is a valuable feature of the platform. Varonis Platform has room for improvement in its user interface, integration, documentation, performance, and cost. On the other hand, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM could benefit from more flexible reports and analytics, faster report generation, improved communication with users about cyber-threat intelligence databases, and additional administrative options.
Service and Support: Varonis Platform receives mostly positive feedback for their customer service, which is described as being both responsive and knowledgeable. On the other hand, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM's customer service is said to be mixed, with some instances of positive experiences but also some mentions of delays in response.
Ease of Deployment: Varonis Platform has an easy and quick deployment process with clear instructions, but some configuration may be necessary. On the other hand, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM's setup experience varies depending on the reviewer's involvement, with data source onboarding taking some time.
Pricing: While Varonis Platform's cost depends on complexity and level of support, Securonix is generally cheaper than other products. However, some reviewers have found Securonix's licensing to be complex and problematic in the long term.
ROI: Securonix offers benefits such as time and manpower savings, contextual information, and improved efficiency and accuracy in investigations. Varonis Platform as well offers an ROI.
Comparison Results: Users prefer Securonix Next-Gen SIEM over Varonis Platform due to its user-friendly interface, customizable reporting, and competitive pricing. Securonix's Spotter feature and UEBA capabilities are particularly praised by users.
"The feature that I have found most valuable is their analytics platform where they have the open security data-link, which they introduced. This is typically different from the other vendors."
"When we were looking for products for our security monitoring needs, our biggest requirement was that we wanted something based on machine-learning and analytics. If you go with rules, it can raise a lot of noise. Securonix, with its UEBA capability, had the best analytics use-cases."
"The two major features of this product we extensively use are the UEBA capability and the multi-tenant approach with the centralized data logs system. Customers are very happy with these features."
"The big data security analytics platform, structured and unstructured data analytics, and user and entity behavior analytics provided by the product are probably the best in the industry."
"[The solution has] incident-management or case-management functionality. If someone were to download a high number and we decided we needed to investigate it, I could open a case right in the tool. It would be able to directly reference the data that they downloaded and we could open and shut the case directly in the tool, as well as report from it."
"The most valuable feature is being able to look at users' behavioral profiles to see what they typically access. One of the key events that we monitor is people's downloading of objects... It's very easy to see people's patterns, what they typically do."
"The detection of threats and reduction of false positive alarms as compared to other solutions are valuable features. It has improved threat detection response and reduced a lot of noise from false positives as compared to our previous SIEM solutions."
"The solution is stable and scalable."
"The solution has significantly improved data security and compliance posture by allowing us to track and monitor activities. We can see who accesses data and when files are created and understand what's happening in our environment."
"Varonis Platform is transparent and captures everything in the environment without impacting the performance. The tool helps us unify data feeds into a single reporting system."
"There's also a 90-day policy where if a user is not using the warehouse, it will automatically delete that username."
"We have compliance needs. We have investigation needs. And we have situations where an analyst needs to look at threats. These three things require a different view of how they look at the threats. What would be good is to have Securonix create three different views of their Security Command Center so that, depending on the persona of the person logging in, they'd get the relevant data they need and not see everything."
"It could be improved a little bit more for admin users. There should be more administrative options related to security for admin users. For example, for forensic purposes, the admin should be able to stop a specific user from erasing some information. I would be helpful in certain situations, such as during an internal fraud."
"Securonix implements risk scores based on different policies that are triggered. We've seen some challenges with the risk scores and how they trigger. These are things that Securonix has recognized and they've been working with us to help improve things."
"Parsing needs to be improved. Every time we integrate a new, specific data source, we face a lot of problems in parsing, even for the old data source."
"We would like a little more face-to-face training. Securonix has several tutorials on its website, but we want there to be a person in Colombia who does training or workshops to give us a better understanding of the platform."
"There is slight room for improvement in terms of the initial deployment. What I see is that Securonix is more focused on their product. They are expanding, in a big way, the number of customers. So there has to be a number of dedicated teams to jump on and speed up the deployment process."
"Other than issues with the training, there have been issues with the encryption. There have also been issues with some of the reporting, minor glitches that they have fixed as they've gone along."
"There is room for improvement in the product's integration with ServiceNow and in the reporting features."
"The product is very complicated."
"There is one thing that if I add something manually, I get so many alerts. That's the biggest bad thing."
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is ranked 4th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 27 reviews while Varonis Platform is ranked 8th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 3 reviews. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is rated 8.6, while Varonis Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Securonix Next-Gen SIEM writes "Spotter tool has helped us eliminate many hours required to manually create link analysis diagrams". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Varonis Platform writes "Offers visibility and helps to keep track of access ". Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, LogRhythm SIEM and Sumo Logic Security, whereas Varonis Platform is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, BigID, Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and Lepide. See our Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Varonis Platform report.
See our list of best Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.