We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The offensive security where they do a fix is valuable. They go to a misconfiguration and provide detailed alerts on what could be there. They also provide a remediation feature where if we give the permission, they can also go and fix the issue."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"Cloud Native Security offers a valuable tool called an offensive search engine."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The security is good."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"The reporting works well, but sometimes the severity classifications are inaccurate. Sometimes, it flags an issue as high-impact, but it should be a lower severity."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"There is a bit of a learning curve for new users."
"There should be more documentation about the product."
"Implementing single sign-on requires a pre-class account feature, which is currently not available."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"The Kubernetes scanning on the Oracle Cloud needs to be improved. It's on the roadmap. AWS has this capability, but it's unavailable for Oracle Cloud."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 77 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Sysdig Secure, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
