We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Selenium integration."
"TestComplete is simple, it's a very easy-to-use tool."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps."
"The solution is mainly stable."
"Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well."
"The ease-of-use and quality of the overall product are above average."
"Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution."
"It is very easy to maintain tests with this tool. It covers all necessary items in the test plan. The most painful item in testing is maintenance. When changes occur, the tests should be maintained."
"TFS is very user-friendly."
"I like the build management features and the integration with Jenkins and many other tools."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is that it keeps the code secure while working collaboratively in a team of four or five individuals."
"Microsoft's technical team is supportive."
"The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable features are the dashboard and task-selection capability."
"Headless testing would be a big improvement."
"The integration tools could be better."
"Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work."
"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing."
"Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage."
"If that engine could better identify more XPaths automatically and make the process more flexible, that would be better."
"In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult."
"We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses."
"The program and portfolio planning facility can be improved."
"TFS is scalable with different Microsoft tools for test management but it is not scalable with other third-party tools."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"TFS needs to be stable."
"The user interface could improve and test management was not useful in TFS."
"I'm looking for specific options that aren't currently available, such as active status, new status, or what's currently in progress."
"TFS should allow more integration with different platforms."
"Since the TFS was an on-prem solution, the private network accessibility was restricted."
SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 7th in Test Automation Tools with 72 reviews while TFS is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 93 reviews. SmartBear TestComplete is rated 7.6, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "A stable product that needs to improve its integration capabilities with other test management tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio, OpenText UFT One and froglogic Squish, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, TestRail and OpenText ALM / Quality Center. See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. TFS report.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.