We performed a comparison between SUSE NeuVector and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SUSE NeuVector is distinguished by its ISO certification verification and advanced automation. Trend Micro Cloud One offers comprehensive protection against vulnerabilities, login inspection, event tracking, and a bug bounty program. SUSE NeuVector could improve by adding support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines and enhancing its monitoring and reporting capabilities. Users also want better integration with other security solutions and greater visibility into the DevSec pipeline. Trend Micro Cloud One should focus equally focus on AWS and Azure while improving automation and robustness.
Service and Support: Customers are pleased with the technical assistance offered by SUSE NeuVector, finding it helpful, responsive, and knowledgeable. However, there are concerns about the complexity of the support process. Trend Micro Cloud One was highly praised for its customer service and support. Users valued the support team's expertise and liked the round-the-clock availability.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for SUSE NeuVector can be challenging, depending on the environment and complexity of the project. It may require custom scripts for integration into the pipeline, and more skilled personnel are needed as the complexity increases. Deploying Trend Micro Cloud One can take upwards of a month and requires some development experience. Those with experience consider the deployment to be straightforward, but it typically involves a team of engineers or a small group of people managing the solution.
Pricing: SUSE NeuVector users gave mixed feedback on the pricing, but some users mentioned that large customers can negotiate a better deal. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is considered a little high, but users said it falls within the middle range. There may be additional costs depending on the specific use case. The licensing contracts are annual, but there are options for monthly, quarterly, or yearly payments.
ROI: SUSE NeuVector is highly beneficial for industries such as financial services, offering a valuable return on investment. Trend Micro Cloud One stands out for its flexibility and ease of integration.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over SUSE NeuVector. Users appreciate its comprehensive security features, scalability, and ease of setup. The pricing is considered reasonable, and the payment options are flexible. Trend Micro technical support is highly rated for its knowledge and expertise.
"The mean time to detect has been reduced."
"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"The user interface is well-designed and easy to navigate."
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The stability is quite good."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"We had a glitch in PingSafe where it fed us false positives in the past."
"If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have."
"The reporting works well, but sometimes the severity classifications are inaccurate. Sometimes, it flags an issue as high-impact, but it should be a lower severity."
"One of the issues with the product stems from the fact that it clubs different resources under one ticket."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"PingSafe filtering has some areas that cause problems, and to achieve single sign-on functionality, a break-glass feature, which is currently unavailable, is necessary."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SUSE NeuVector is ranked 20th in Container Security with 7 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
