We performed a comparison between Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the ease of modification."
"The features I like most about this solution is the endpoint modules because it gives us the protection we need."
"We are able to contain our confidential data in our environment."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be partial enlisting."
"Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the number one product in its field. It does its job well and it has all the necessary features. It is definitely better than any other solution on the market."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The data-at-rest features are the most valuable because they let us identify data infected with ransomware and prevent employees from being exploited through phishing attacks. If an employee is compromised, the attacker can access servers and deposit ransomware. This enables the attacker to exfiltrate data remotely using employees' credentials. It might be valuable data that could cause a business reputational and financial damage if stolen and publicized. It could also be credit card data or personal health information stored on critical servers."
"An excellent solution for data classification."
"Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is a reliable product."
"We find the initial setup to be very easy."
"We find the malware scanning and intrusion detection most valuable for our server management requirements. We can find out who is on our servers and what they have done."
"The basic setup, like configuring servers or deploying the SaaS platform and agent implementation, is straightforward."
"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."
"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution."
"There are no issues with the interface."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"In a majority of cases, most of the companies are using DLP for endpoint sessions, where you have a user that might be communicating information outside of the company. However, they forget there are actual interfaces that can directly communicate with either the database or other files within the data center that uses end-to-end encryption. In those cases, you might need things like your DLP to be able to monitor and block some of that. The solution needs to catch information communicated through the data center on the server-side."
"I would like to see an improved interface, with better documentation and integration with other products."
"It is very difficult to log in to create a support ticket because no one is available to support our queries."
"Their support program needs a lot of improvement. If you are stuck somewhere, getting their support can be difficult."
"Reporting could be improved."
"We need to have agent auto-parsing."
"Sometimes setting up the solution can get a little tricky because it would depend on your internal infrastructure. For example, you have to connect the Symantec Data Loss Prevention platform and you need to integrate it, so that could make the process somewhat difficult."
"Agent configuration should be improved for easier interaction for users, particularly by allowing configuration changes to be done on a grid."
"The solution could use better logging in the future."
"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."
"It's hard for me to answer any questions about missing features. It's the outside companies who support us that manage this DLP solution at this moment."
"The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution."
"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."
"Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to."
"In Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, there is a need to improve the plug-in manager, as it is an area with shortcomings."
"Trend Micro could be priced better, currently, it's a bit high. And there needs to be better after the sale, technical support."
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 53 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Zscaler DLP and Safetica ONE, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP, Digital Guardian and Safetica ONE. See our Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
