We performed a comparison between Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is stable."
"The solution’s installation was easy."
"We use it for protecting accounts, which is its most valuable feature."
"I like the solution for its encryption."
"The management console gives us the ability to quickly control who sees what, ensures we are on the latest version, and up-to-date."
"This product is a solid, all-in-one solution for enterprise data management."
"The initial setup was easy."
"It has reduced the number of incidents related to the loss of information."
"The most valuable feature is the support for email."
"Encryption is the basic feature, and that is what I like about it. I also like that it is kind of easy to install and easy to configure."
"We use the solution for data encryption."
"The encryption is very good."
"Very good interface."
"It's a secure and quick solution."
"Trend Micro provides good overall protection. It has saved us from a few attacks and malware."
"We're very satisfied with Trend Micro support."
"Its remote deployment should be improved. Currently, there is no remote deployment for Symantec Endpoint Encryption. You have to install it manually. There are some issues with AD integration and the time taken to reflect a password on the Endpoint Encryption Manager when a new user has changed the password, but they are already working on these issues, and these will be resolved in the next release."
"We would like some advanced security protection features."
"They have too high of a price tag. That's why they're losing the market share."
"The UI could be improved."
"The instability of the company and lack of presence in the Middle East is affecting product use."
"The security could be improved."
"The solution presently doesn't let network folder encryption be done on Macintosh."
"The solution does not have endpoint control."
"The user interface is a little challenging, especially for beginners. It's hard for new users to understand how to configure the correct access for each company function."
"Integration and support could be improved."
"Support from them was not fast."
"They need to come up with cloud solutions."
"We would like to see a wider, better dashboard for the purposes of monitoring the users of the Trend Micro software."
"The product's scalability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"We had to use an integrator for the implementation of Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption. We have two people who work on this solution."
"It is not easy to integrate with third party solutions."
More Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption Pricing and Cost Advice →
Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews while Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption is ranked 5th in Endpoint Encryption with 20 reviews. Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Provides a centralized management console and a straightforward initial setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption writes "Used for mobile device protection with moderate pricing". Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian and WinMagic SecureDoc, whereas Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Sophos SafeGuard, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint and McAfee Complete Data Protection. See our Symantec Endpoint Encryption vs. Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.