We performed a comparison between Tricentis Tosca and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is it is a completely scriptless automation tool, which I liked a lot. They keep on continuously improving their tools, wherever we are facing any challenges they are able to provide a solution for it. It is easy to learn, everyone can easily read and understand what is happening with the scripts. Any business user or function tester can use the tool efficiently. This is a complete solution package."
"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"I face no challenges or stability issues."
"It's been very helpful to have connectivity with mobile. The tool also identifies some of the actual changes from the recordings on the actual testing suite. That is something that I really like."
"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"More and more artificial intelligence (AI) is coming in. So, some amount of AI to create natural language processing (NLP)-based test cases and manage defects would be very helpful. This is because the technologies have evolved in the last five to six months, so there is a potential opportunity there."
"Tosca's reporting features could be better. Tricentis had a reporting tool called Analytics, but it didn't function properly after they reworked it. After that, they tried a new approach with key-tracing, and that didn't work."
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"There should be ease of data manipulation within automation test cases."
"It requires some coding customization that requires expertise."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"The documentation is limited."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 98 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail. See our Tricentis Tosca vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.