We performed a comparison between ActiveMQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I'm impressed, I think that Active MQ is great."
"The initial setup is straightforward and only takes a few minutes."
"Most people or many people recommended using ActiveMQ on small and medium-scale applications."
"I am impressed with the tool’s latency. Also, the messages in ActiveMQ wait in a queue. The messages will start to move when the system reopens after getting stuck."
"The most important feature is that it's best for JVM-related languages and JMS integration."
"It provides the best support services."
"Reliable message delivery and mirroring."
"The ability to store the failed events for some time is valuable."
"Tanzu Greenplum's most valuable features include the integration of modern data science approaches across an MPP platform."
"The loading speed is very good."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."
"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"The solution is stable."
"Message Management: Better management of the messages. Perhaps persist them, or put in another queue with another life cycle."
"The UI. It's both a good thing and a bad thing. The UI is too simple. Sometimes you wanna see the messages coming to the queue, and you have to refresh the dashboard, the console of the product."
"This solution could improve by providing better documentation."
"The tool needs to improve its installation part which is lengthy. The product is already working on that aspect so that the complete installation gets completed within a month."
"It does not scale out well. It ends up being very complex if you have a lot of mirror queues."
"From the TPS point of view, it's like 100,000 transactions that need to be admitted from different devices and also from the different minor small systems. Those are best fit for Kafka. We have used it on the customer side, and we thought of giving a try to ActiveMQ, but we have to do a lot of performance tests and approval is required before we can use it for this scale."
"I would like the tool to improve compliance and stability. We will encounter issues while using the central applications. In the solution's future releases, I want to control and set limitations for databases."
"Needs to focus on a certain facet and be good at it, instead of handling support for most of the available message brokers."
"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."
"Implementation takes a long time."
"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting."
"If you have a user consuming a huge load of resources, it takes down the entire system."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"The initial deployment was a little difficult."
"Lacks sufficient inbuilt machine-learning functions for complex use cases."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
ActiveMQ is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 24 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. ActiveMQ is rated 7.8, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "Allows for asynchronous communication, enabling services to operate independently but issues with stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". ActiveMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Red Hat AMQ, Amazon SQS and Apache Kafka, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and Oracle Exadata. See our ActiveMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
