We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that it is simple."
"Amazon AWS is very stable."
"The environment is a rich playground, and if you tried to do the same things on-premises that you do on AWS, it would be a lot more challenging to execute. You can open up a virtual machine on AWS, run some experiments, and be done with it. It's much easier than buying new servers, provisioning them, etc"
"Amazon AWS has many merits, in terms of scalability, stability, and availability. I have loved using this tool."
"Using AWS is really helpful for saving costs."
"AWS is easy to manage."
"This solution features ease of use and market adaptability."
"It streamlines tasks like table creation and data loading into Redshift, making the process more efficient and manageable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."
"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."
"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."
"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."
"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."
"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."
"While feasible, custom configuration will be more time consuming than standard."
"The product should reduce carbon emissions."
"The price could be better."
"Its subscription model or pricing model is too complex, which should be improved."
"In terms of improvement, they should try to give more emphasis to the VoIP system."
"I would appreciate more direct support from AWS."
"Identity and access management on AWS could be straightforward."
"There have been some issues in the past when it comes to file integrations in AWS's cloud products. However, there are now alternative solutions out there that are helping to integrate them all."
"The product is expensive."
"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."
"They need to improve the core licensing model."
"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."
"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."
"Automation could be improved."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Red Hat OpenShift writes "Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Azure Red Hat OpenShift is most compared with OpenShift and VMware Tanzu Application Service. See our Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.