We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Docker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We haven't faced any major issues in one and a half years of use."
"The most valuable feature is the computing speed."
"Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"Amazon EKS is very scalable."
"Break down your application into small modules to improve resiliency"
"The product helps us to configure the new environment."
"The stability is excellent."
"Overall Amazon EKS is a good solution in the industry. The solution can support multi tendencies, and network isolations are the key factors."
"The current version is quite good with our application."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is that it provides a containerized environment. The isolation between the environments is beneficial. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the Dockerfile, which makes the life of developers easy. Developers get a real understanding of container creation."
"I have seen end-to-end performance with Docker. It's a great tool, and it's the most popular container service in the market."
"Feature-wise, Docker is very user-friendly...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"Docker's containerization property is its main selling point."
"Docker is very reliable. It's easy to scale, and it's very stable."
"I am impressed with the product's independence. We can also deploy it anywhere."
"The goal and idea behind microservices are to always be available and capable of handling any load, no matter how many requests come through...All of these services are great, but I also think it would be useful to have the same technology available in a miniature resource size, enabling the same applications and services to run on a small machine."
"They should include some essential configuration features to it."
"The solution could be improved by adding monitoring, filtering, and logging capabilities to its current CloudWatch features."
"The overall stability of the product should be improved to prevent any loss of data."
"They need to work on the Amazon plugins on the Kubernetes cluster."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"They should enhance the Jira integration."
"Amazon EKS's vulnerability management of data could be improved."
"The solution needs to be more scalable for local machines."
"I want to see if new architectures have been incorporated in Docker or if we have to wait for another release."
"The volumes for persistent storage could be more user friendly right out of the box."
"The documentation could be improved."
"The runtime and security could improve in Docker. Security is paramount in the cloud and important."
"The security layer is very vulnerable, although they are working to improve the system hardening and email hardening."
"Management can be improved with the necessary tools for orchestration."
"One item that could be improved is the overall stability of Docker."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Docker is ranked 7th in Container Management with 40 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Docker is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Linode and Komodor, whereas Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. See our Amazon EKS vs. Docker report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
