We performed a comparison between Amazon EMR and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The project management is very streamlined."
"In Amazon EMR it is easy to rebuild anything, easy to upgrade and has good fault tolerance."
"Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data."
"The solution helps us manage huge volumes of data."
"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."
"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."
"We are using applications, such as Splunk, Livy, Hadoop, and Spark. We are using all of these applications in Amazon EMR and they're helping us a lot."
"This is the best tool for hosts and it's really flexible and scalable."
"The speed at which it gets the data is great."
"The product handles high volumes very well and provides good integration."
"This solution is very fast."
"We've had good experiences with technical support."
"The most valuable features I have found are speed, dashboard, and reporting."
"This is a feature-rich product and I like all of them."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the interaction it provides with external suppliers and clients."
"In comparison with other DMS solutions, it offers good performance."
"The most complicated thing is configuring to the cluster and ensure it's running correctly."
"Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance."
"There were times where they would release new versions and it seemed to end up breaking old versions, which is very strange."
"As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data."
"The product must add some of the latest technologies to provide more flexibility to the users."
"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."
"The dashboard management could be better. Right now, it's lacking a bit."
"The initial setup was time-consuming."
"The solution is very expensive for us."
"SAP HANA is not perfect and they could improve by having more options and more integration."
"It could be a bit more scalable."
"When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems."
"The solution's development platform should be more flexible and scalable to adapt to other solutions."
"HANA could be improved by adding analytics and development models in the institution."
"The initial setup was very, very complex, tedious, and costly and required someone with great expertise to complete it."
"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great."
Amazon EMR is ranked 3rd in Hadoop with 20 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 1st in Embedded Database with 81 reviews. Amazon EMR is rated 7.8, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EMR writes "Provides efficient data processing features and has good scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Amazon EMR is most compared with Snowflake, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, Azure Data Factory, Amazon Redshift and Apache Spark, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Amazon EMR vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.