We performed a comparison between Amazon EventBridge and IBM MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon EventBridge is very flexible."
"The best feature is that it allows you to perform recurring tasks efficiently."
"It has self-explanatory documentation and works with most projects."
"It's very simple to set up our cron with Amazon EventBridge."
"IBM MQ is robust compared to other products in the market. It also gives you support from the IBM team."
"I haven't seen any issues with respect to the message loss."
"Has helped integrate between applications, reduce rework, and costs by reusing working components of existing applications."
"A stable and reliable software that offers good integration between different systems."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Integrates between distributed systems: For example, it can help integrate processing between mainframe, client-server, web-based applications by integrating the messages, supporting Service Oriented Architecture."
"Data integrity, reliability and security are valuable features that IBM MQ possesses."
"IBM is still adding some features and coding some other systems on the security end. However, it has the most security features I've seen in a communication solution. Security is the most important thing for our purposes."
"Amazon EventBridge doesn't have the feature of event replay."
"It would be easy if we had an option to select multiple things to run the script from Monday to Friday."
"Currently, it only supports triggering one job at a time. It would be helpful if it could handle multiple jobs or triggers simultaneously. What I mean is that currently, we can only perform one job at a time."
"It would be good if the solution provided a feature to add multiple Cron expressions in one rule."
"Presenting and maybe having some different options for different user experiences based on the administrative duties that you have to do as an app manager or configure the server or security would be an improvement."
"It's not always easy for applications to connect to IBM MQ, but I think it's fine in general."
"There are many complications with IBM MQ servers."
"With IBM products, there's less marketing. If they do more demos and more seminars on their products, it will be very useful. On a given day. I get seminar invites for many vendors and products, but for IBM, I may get an invite once or twice a year."
"We need to have a better administration console and better monitoring features. Right now, they are not good and could be a lot better."
"We would like to see the IBM technical support team extend their hand to providing support for other cloud vendors like Azure, Google Cloud, and AWS"
"IBM HQ's scalability isn't the best."
"It could get a face lift with a modern marketing campaign."
Amazon EventBridge is ranked 4th in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) with 4 reviews while IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) with 158 reviews. Amazon EventBridge is rated 9.0, while IBM MQ is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EventBridge writes "Allows automatic notifications for events and stable performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". Amazon EventBridge is most compared with Amazon SNS, PubSub+ Event Broker, Oracle BAM, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and PubSub+ Event Portal, whereas IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware Tanzu Data Services, Red Hat AMQ and IBM Event Streams. See our Amazon EventBridge vs. IBM MQ report.
See our list of best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.
We monitor all Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.