We performed a comparison between Apigee and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Tracing in Apigee is a very good feature."
"The use case which I have installed serves the intended purpose."
"Apigee is a very lightweight solution."
"I use it because it's simple, it automatically updates, and It hasn't given me any issues."
"If you have numerous applications and high traffic, Apigee is a strong choice for its excellent features and outstanding performance."
"Technical support has been decent."
"Apigee has proven to be one of the best of the breed."
"Apigee is a great product with good feedback and recommendations from clients."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"The solution is scalable."
"The pricing for the product was a bit higher. I also found it challenging to manage sometimes."
"We do not have control over the installation."
"I see some lagging in regards to integration capacity"
"The analytical aspect of it could be better. I think it is fair if Apigee lets you configure some of the metrics of the key details you want to monitor in terms of analytics."
"More documentation on the Open Banking Standard will help."
"Google isn't enthusiastic about supporting older versions. Google is now trying to move all of its clients to X within the cloud."
"The account simplification process can be improved."
"Integration should be improved."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, WSO2 API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our Apigee vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.