We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Cavisson NetDiagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Once you get past installation, AppDynamics is highly stable and we get good results."
"Being able to install it on-prem and monitor our on-prem infrastructure is important for us... Most of our infrastructure is on-prem. We have highly scalable systems and AppDynamics will help us monitor our load on-prem. Our systems range from simple to the most complex and it gives us the visibility across transactions, in one dashboard."
"We can make custom alerts in our system for specific issues like high CPU utilization or application downtime."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is that you can easily determine the load on the application."
"Error analysis in the troubleshooting sections go straight to the point."
"This is a stable product and we definitely plan to continue using it in the future."
"AppDynamics is easy to implement if you follow the documentation, and the documentation that they provide is good."
"In 2014 and 2015, AppDynamics was one of the best products on the market."
"Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"It could be a little more flexible in configuration on the back end."
"It would help to maybe have a more graphical interface and more user-friendly graphics."
"There could log management features included in the product."
"The integration ability of AppDynamics with other performance testing tools is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Needs more integration with applications suites, like Oracle Enterprise Server or BMC Remedy."
"The agent deployment could be simplified by, for example, adding a GUI."
"More native support for other hardware is needed because having to install various extensions and perform extra setup for different devices is really challenging, and not as easy or straightforward as it is in other products."
"AppDynamics is agent-based, so some customers are reluctant to install the agents in all their production environments. It would be helpful if they had an agentless version. It covers applications on the server, but the solution is weak on the network side. The agent is not deployed on the network components, so it cannot provide complete information about issues on the network layer."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.