We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Savision Live Maps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Before we moved the code to AppDynamics, we had to compare the agile process and also had to make sure that they're following the standards."
"We can make custom alerts in our system for specific issues like high CPU utilization or application downtime."
"The ability to check parameters for microservice applications is most valuable. It is important for me. I can manually create new business transactions for applications and individually monitor business transactions. I can also use a lot of extensions. It has a lot of extensions to monitor other third-party applications, such as NoSQL applications, memory cache applications, Kafka applications, and Couchbase applications. It is very useful. We are also using the end-user monitoring site to follow all end-user activities. It is important for us to check the errors on the customer site."
"We set up alerts recently so we can fix any issues more quickly in production."
"The most valuable feature is the live reporting on the current health\performance of our application"
"It is used to test customer behavior on a website."
"It helped to find quick solutions for specific business transactions."
"AppDynamics' most valuable features are the response time of the business transaction modules, the ability to monitor multiple services, and testing and developing environments."
"This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM."
"The solution's user interface should be improved."
"There needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings."
"The QA and test environment need improvement."
"Their agents sometimes claim to be very lightweight, especially with databases, but they are very heavy. They can take up more compute than the actual work that we need to do."
"The integration ability of AppDynamics with other performance testing tools is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The GUI can be overwhelming at first to a novice Dev or Ops support person, and the possible root causes of an issue do not bubble up to the first screen you see."
"AppDynamics's agent management could be improved."
"I would like to see more artificial intelligence and machine learning brought in to monitor the statement and payment sum issues we have."
"Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion."
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Savision Live Maps is ranked 72nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Savision Live Maps is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Savision Live Maps writes "Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Savision Live Maps is most compared with SCOM and Accedian Skylight.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.