Apteligent vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
VMware Logo
141 views|113 comparisons
Quest Software Logo
views| comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apteligent and Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."
  • "The price is expensive for us."
  • "Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."
  • "Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."
  • More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    141
    Comparisons
    113
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Crittercism
    Foglight, Dell Foglight
    Learn More
    Quest Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Get insights, guidelines, and preferred outcomes that will help you deliver the best possible mobile experience for your customers and help make your mobile business successful like never before.

    When milliseconds can cost you millions, Apteligent reveals operational and usage trends, uncovers issues, and analyzes behaviors. This allows you to continuously improve apps, keep users happy, and put your mobile business at the top of its game.

    Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.
    Sample Customers
    AT&T, Bloomberg, CNN, Experian, Fox, JC Penny, Urban Outfitters, Nokia, Lutron, NASCAR, T-Mobile, Urban Engines, Microsoft, Lego
    Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apteligent is ranked 84th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Apteligent is rated 0.0, while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] writes "We evaluated other options including BMC, but chose Foglight for it's notifications & the ability to review the history". Apteligent is most compared with , whereas Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is most compared with Catchpoint.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Mobile APM vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.