We performed a comparison between Arbor DDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very flexible and we can easily deploy it to our network. It's very user-friendly. We can do everything via the web interface and troubleshoot easily from the CLI. It's not complicated."
"Arbor has the ability to learn and self-create the appropriate profile for each customer."
"Valuable features include simple and centralized management of user access and capabilities, as well as Web 2.0 interactive attack alerting, traffic visualization, and mitigation service control."
"It's just one dashboard with mitigation. You decide which mitigation you want and at what threshold to do this or that. Its operation is pretty simple. It's easy."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution is flexible, easy to implement and has an efficient technical support team."
"We use it not only for DDoS detection and protection, but we also use it for traffic analysis and capacity planning as well. We've also been able to extend the use of it to other security measures within our company, the front-line defense, not only for DDoS, but for any kind of scanning malware that may be picked up. It's also used for outbound attacks, which has helped us mitigate those and lower our bandwidth costs..."
"There were huge attacks in October, around 62 attacks at 30 gigabits per second, at one of our banks. We used Arbor DDoS to mitigate these attacks, and it performed great."
"A valuable feature is the speed of signature updates."
"The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."
"SSL-based mitigation from DDoS attacks is good from their side. They are capable of preventing SSL-based attacks with certifications and everything loaded onto them."
"Its functionality is very good."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"It offers valuable insights into ongoing and past attacks, aiding in post-incident analysis and continuous improvement of our cybersecurity strategy."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"It has kept us up and operational on a day-to-day basis, without being interrupted by an attack from outside sources."
"On the application layer, they could have a better distributed traffic flow. They could improve that a bit. For network data it is very effective, but the application layer can be improved."
"Arbor DDoS could improve out-of-the-box reporting, it could be better."
"The solution needs to enhance its features to compete with other tools."
"A small improvement could be a better reporting system."
"The product could have end-to-end platform visibility."
"On the main page there are alerts that we are unable to clear, even though the issue has been resolved."
"The support got worse after NETSCOUT acquired Arbor."
"The solution's IT support needs improvement."
"Right now, we have DefensePro 6. The only complaint I have is that SSL inspection, when activated, consumes a lot of resources on the machine. We are currently reviewing a possible change to DefensePro X, the new version, which has a separate module with its processors."
"I would like to see more focus on layer seven protection."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"I had some trouble in the registration account prior to deployment, but it was fixed. They were not very fast or responsive, however. It took about one week to resolve the issue."
"It could incorporate more intelligence for reacting with web site visitors."
"We would like to have seven-layer functionality."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."
Arbor DDoS is ranked 2nd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 46 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 23 reviews. Arbor DDoS is rated 8.6, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Arbor DDoS writes "A critical solution for security, as it includes features that can automatically detect and prevent DDoS attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Arbor DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Corero, Imperva DDoS, A10 Thunder TPS and Fortinet FortiDDoS, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and F5 Silverline Managed Services. See our Arbor DDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.