We performed a comparison between ARCON Secure Compliance Management and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very user friendly. There are not a lot of clicks and buttons. The tool helps me with the installations. The user can do the installation rather than having a technical guide. I also like the browsing stream. It has a good dashboard."
"The support for ARCON ARSIM is very good."
"Good for productivity checking."
"The solution is completely stable and operation is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"Tenable.sc's best features are the availability model, accident management, and scoring."
"Tenable SC is good for reporting and alerting. The filtering feature is also very valuable. Its integration with multiple vendors is quite good. It can be integrated with SIEM solutions and PAM solutions such as Thycotic, which is very helpful."
"The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"I think that this is a good solution for evaluating vulnerability in the network."
"This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives."
"This solution has a much lower rate of false positives compared to competing products."
"The automation needs to be improved."
"I would love to have all the products. Currently they have all the server operating systems and network operating systems but they should have all the other devices also included, like security devices. That's what I think is missing. They should also improve the license audit part. If I want to do a license audit from this tool, I'm not able to do it right now."
"As for what can be improved, definitely pricing. Customers look for pricing and ARCON is a little more expensive than Thycotic. So the pricing model could be improved."
"Tenable SC could be improved with additional connectivity to external company postures and the capability of managing and sustaining agents in the systems directly without additional platforms in the middle."
"The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy."
"We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with"
"The web application is not very functional."
"Tenable's reporting engine needs improvement. It needs to be more efficient and add more features."
"The solution should provide better web application features and support."
"The solution is expensive."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
ARCON Secure Compliance Management is ranked 36th in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. ARCON Secure Compliance Management is rated 8.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARCON Secure Compliance Management writes "Great for productivity checking and provides good reports ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". ARCON Secure Compliance Management is most compared with , whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai. See our ARCON Secure Compliance Management vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
