We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Check Point Security Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"It is one of the best products available in the market."
"It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."
"The machine learning is a good feature."
"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."
"We check a lot of logs in ArcSight Logger because we're running a massive database platform."
"The technical support team is good...It is a scalable solution."
"The support is pretty incredible. Check Point has support rep programs that go all the way up to putting one of their own people in your business to help you. Then, they have support programs. If you're an expert, you just need to be able to download updated files and stuff. They have support programs like that, too."
"The solution is easy to use and comes with few vulnerabilities. You don't have to worry about release upgrades. Life cycle management is very easy."
"One of the most outstanding characteristics of its centralized administration is its great computing power."
"This solution is easy to install and deploy. It is also user-friendly."
"We are now able to monitor the different VPN communities in real-time."
"Each department can easily share data with the management without fear of data compromise."
"As the security administrator, who is responsible for the day-to-day tasks (e.g. creating new firewall rules, monitoring the security alerts and incidents etc.) and the maintenance (e.g. installing the new Jumbo Hotfixes), I find the Check Point Security Management R80.10 to be the great solution."
"The company uses software called Harmony. Check Point integrates nicely, whether on an endpoint or mobile device. It integrates well with the firewall and can give me reports that I can check without going to an online portal."
"It would be better if the product is cheaper."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."
"The speed of Logger indexing and searching for certain bugs for some queries that we provide could be improved. It can handle a huge number of logs but it can be improved."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"It sometimes blocks safe sites when I am researching, affecting the overall output and wasting time."
"The management API can be further developed so that all functions offered by the dashboard are also available via the API (for example, Network Topology)."
"The web administration tool that allows administration in the browser must be developed even more."
"Troubleshooting is quite complicated within multi-domain management. If an issue arises, the local administrator has to keep in mind that there are other domains that could be also affected."
"I would like to bind users to their network, as well as their local office machine."
"It would be helpful if we could enable URL and application traffic control remote access."
"We'd like to see more and more integration possibilities between Checkpoint and other vendor security solutions such as Malwarebytes, SIEM solution providers, and standalone vulnerability scanners."
"In my experience, the place they can improve the most is in the technical support where I have had some serious problems that could not be solved in time due to a lack of knowledge of the assigned engineer."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ArcSight Logger is ranked 28th in Log Management with 31 reviews while Check Point Security Management is ranked 9th in Log Management with 56 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform. See our ArcSight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
