We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are mainly using Aruba ClearPass for our clients for securing access to their on-premise assets. As per customer expectations, we are trying our best to track the complete user activity in the network. This is the main and the core feature we require."
"A lot of the issues in Forescout are mitigated in Aruba ClearPass, it supports all the expected protocols."
"The most valuable thing about Aruba ClearPass is its ease of use. It has always been a very reliable and very stable policy management platform."
"The most valuable feature, I would say, is the cost-effectiveness of the solution when compared to others."
"I like the integration options with a multitude of other vendors and Aruba applications."
"Its clustering model saved us staff time and reduced errors by eliminating the need to manage individual RADIUS servers."
"It's a great solution with multi-vendor support. That's always useful."
"ClearPass's best feature is its comprehensiveness."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve the user interface, it is a bit chunky."
"Instructions on adding layouts are not as clear as they could be."
"In the next version, I would like to see some enhancement or extension on the tracking side. For example, when any user enters the network, it should be more visible in the graphical form."
"After HP, their support is the worst."
"The user interface should be improved. The logs and how the logging mechanism works can also use an upgrade."
"The technical support has some room for improvement. It takes them a long time to respond sometimes. I rate Aruba support six out of 10."
"TLS authentication onboarding in Aruba ClearPass needs to be improved. The biggest problem we've seen in our environment is Huawei not being able to get onto Google Play. No Huawei device can be onboarded via Aruba ClearPass easily."
"The solution needs to upgrade its user interface. Right now, it's not so user friendly, and it's an aspect that my clients' wish was improved upon."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and Varonis Platform, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiNAC. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.