We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and AutoSys Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"The Action Packs are a good feature."
"We don't have to manually run things anymore. We can have the work that a team of 50 people would do, all inside of one platform."
"It streamlines processing really well, so we're able to cut down on our processing times."
"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is user-friendliness. If someone has some knowledge of the tool they can use it."
"I find that it provides better agility in regards to job execution features."
"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."
"We automate recurring processes, keeping track of IT processes controlled worldwide."
"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."
"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 19th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with AppWorx Workload Automation, Redwood RunMyJobs and Automic Workload Automation, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Automation Intelligence report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.