We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Comodo cWatch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The most valuable feature is the security, making sure that files are protected, preventing unauthorized users from accessing the system."
"We do not have to maintain the solution."
"It is a one-click WAF with no effort needed."
"The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"The solution is stable."
"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"We get alerts if we have some malware."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"It is sometimes a lot of work going through the rules and making sure you have everything covered for a use case. It is just the way rules are set and maintained in this solution. Some UI changes will probably be helpful. It is not easy to find the documentation of new features. Documentation not being updated is a common problem with all services, including this one. You have different versions of the console, and the options shown in the documentation are not there. For a new feature, there is probably an announcement about being released, but when it comes out, there is no actual documentation about how to use it. This makes you either go to technical support or community, which probably doesn't have an idea either. The documentation on the cloud should be the latest one. Finding information about a specific event can be a bit challenging. For this solution, not much documentation is available in the community. It could be because it is a new tool. Whenever there is an issue, it is just not that simple to resolve, especially if you don't have premium support. You have pretty much nowhere to look around, and you just need to poke around to try and make it work right."
"The cost must be reduced."
"The product could be improved by expanding the weightage units of rules."
"The technical support does not respond to bugs in the coding of the product."
"They should make the implementation process faster."
"The cost management has room for improvement."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"The portal is a little slow."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Comodo cWatch is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Comodo cWatch is most compared with Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Cloudflare, Sucuri and SiteLock.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.