We performed a comparison between Azure DNS and Infoblox DDI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed DNS solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and flexible."
"Azure DNS provides value beyond its user-friendly interface and easy learning curve."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a stable product."
"One of the key benefits of Azure DNS is its integration with other Azure services. As it is a solution developed by Microsoft, it is easy to integrate with other Azure offerings. Azure DNS also includes Defender for DNS, a feature that protects against anomalies and threats on the DNS. This added security is provided directly by Microsoft. The integration and security features of Azure DNS make it a valuable option for users of the Azure cloud platform."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the simplicity of putting DBs."
"The DNS resolution is the most valuable feature."
"From a security perspective, Microsoft is much better than other cloud providers."
"Infoblox has more technology patents than any of its competitors."
"The best feature is the user interface."
"Infoblox DDI prioritizes DNS security, which is crucial for the security department."
"The most valuable feature of Infoblox DDI is its IP Address Management (IPAM) tool. This tool allows for the effective management of IP addresses and provides the capability to detect duplicates, hence its moniker "discovery." Another feature that I find particularly useful is the integration of DNS, which can be seamlessly integrated with your existing primary DNS server, making the overall experience much more seamless and efficient."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"Infoblox DDI is a good tool if you want to centralize everything in your environment...It is a stable solution."
"The solution should provide better pricing."
"The product must be integrated with additional security features."
"While it's stable, there's always room for improvement to ensure it remains reliable."
"The scalability could improve."
"There are some issues with the solution's performance where improvements are needed."
"The security features and stability needs to be bettered."
"I would like to see more security features and protection."
"The process of creating a virtual mission could be improved."
"Regarding an upcoming release of Infoblox DDI, I would like to see an improvement in the existing integration with Ansible. Currently, the integration is not up to par and requires further enhancements, particularly in Ansible version 2.5. Additionally, the GUI is slow, it could be improved."
"The solution is expensive."
"They need to reconsider their pricing for their SMB customers. It is a hurdle for them to manage the price."
"They need to provide more training and tutorials than what's provided on the website."
"The recategorization part takes longer with Infoblox DDI compared to other companies like Symantec, Zscaler, and Palo Alto."
Azure DNS is ranked 2nd in Managed DNS with 31 reviews while Infoblox DDI is ranked 8th in Managed DNS with 6 reviews. Azure DNS is rated 8.4, while Infoblox DDI is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Azure DNS writes "Offers good performance and helps its users with disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infoblox DDI writes "An excellent tool that provides an overall centralized view of everything in an environment, majorly the security part". Azure DNS is most compared with Amazon Route 53, Cloudflare DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Google Cloud DNS and Quad9, whereas Infoblox DDI is most compared with BlueCat Integrity, VitalQIP, Cisco Network Registrar, Cloudflare DNS and Amazon Route 53. See our Azure DNS vs. Infoblox DDI report.
See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
