Board vs OneStream XF comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Board International Logo
1,529 views|1,031 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
OneStream Logo
1,416 views|854 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Board and OneStream XF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. OneStream XF Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"All the reports are prepared automatically.""It has definitely saved us time, especially in our budget and planning processes.""My favourite feature of BOARD is the ability to write back to the OLAP DB, as well as the Rdb, and secure user data allowing databases to be flushed and rebuilt daily.""The most valuable features are the reporting and the charts. The reporting functionality is handy for aggregation, when it comes to planning. That ability is fascinating and our users are very happy with it. The charts and the reporting allow our users to see all the data and to see how things are going this year or in the COVID situation. They're seeing everything. Instead of having to check data line by line, they're seeing it in a graph and they're seeing it in charts.""Now, we have only one version of the truth.""Our clients have improved a lot in terms of coordination and communication. This has improved their internal performance.""We can build reports super fast.​""It allows people to quickly create dashboards with reports."

More Board Pros →

"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility.""It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership.""We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."

More OneStream XF Pros →

Cons
"​One of the things that I would like to see is the ability to have a rule directly referenced on the cubes.​""We would like to see better logging in the procedural world.""Some of our users are still using an MS Office add-in for Excel for certain calculations, and when they export from Board, some of the values, some of the totals and column names, are not coming through into Excel.""I would like to see better relationships with the partners.""One thing that I personally would like to see is additional visualization tools for visuals.""It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do, and you have to look at a lot of videos before you actually understand, which is a bit frustrating. Their training can be more comprehensive.""It would be huge in the future if BOARD offered a lot more graphs and presentations, and it was a lot easier to use.""It needs more export to Excel functionality. Right now, we're having to build within the cloud-based platform, as well as build within the Excel add-in, because the export to Excel is somewhat ugly."

More Board Cons →

"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet.""Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it.""We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."

More OneStream XF Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."
  • "​In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."
  • "It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."
  • "The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."
  • More Board Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."
  • "The licensing is expensive."
  • "The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."
  • More OneStream XF Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and… more »
    Top Answer:All the reports are prepared automatically.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, the data disappears from the product. We have had a few such cases. When I added my comments to the data, it disappeared. A technical specialist tried to restore it. It was not convenient… more »
    Top Answer:I advise you to try OneStream. This is a very good platform focused on reporting, consolidation and budgeting & forecasting.
    Top Answer:It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership.
    Top Answer:The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors. One thing to consider is their relationship with Microsoft. They often push customers towards Azure, and Azure can get… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,529
    Comparisons
    1,031
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    7.3
    Views
    1,416
    Comparisons
    854
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    797
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Anaplan logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    SAP Analytics Cloud logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    IBM Planning Analytics logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Oracle Hyperion logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SAP Datahug logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

    BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

    Financial Close, Consolidation and Reporting
    Automate the financial close; reduce time waiting for data loads and refreshing of reports throughout the month. Access accurate and secure financial and operational information from any data source.

    Sample Customers
    Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB
    Fruit of the loom, Melrose, AAA, Valeo Foods
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government20%
    Healthcare Company20%
    Hospitality Company10%
    University5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization17%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise23%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Board vs. OneStream XF
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. OneStream XF and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Board is ranked 11th in Business Performance Management with 35 reviews while OneStream XF is ranked 8th in Business Performance Management with 3 reviews. Board is rated 8.6, while OneStream XF is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneStream XF writes "Easy-to-setup product with efficient data integration". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion and SAP Datahug, whereas OneStream XF is most compared with Oracle HFM, Oracle Hyperion, Anaplan and IBM Planning Analytics. See our Board vs. OneStream XF report.

    See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

    We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.