We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is an absolutely stable solution."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"The product is stable."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 13 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi and Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms. See our Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
