We performed a comparison between Camunda and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Bizagi. See our Camunda vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.