We performed a comparison between Camunda and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Documentation can be improved."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 29th in Business Process Design. Camunda is rated 8.2, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
