We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Netskope based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."The rulesets and the findings are valuable. The actual core functionality of it and the efficacy of events are great."
"People implementing this solution are concerned with addressing a significant risk, and within the AWS realm, this tool does de-risk substantially."
"The most valuable feature is the single dashboard that enables us to manage the entire cloud environment from one place."
"We have more visibility than ever before, appreciating the valuable and proactive insight that we receive from the platform."
"The administration portal panel is very intuitive."
"The most valuable features of CloudGuard CNAPP are its reporting capabilities for aggregating vulnerability information and scoring."
"Alerts of cloud activity happening across all accounts is helpful."
"The various CNAPP modules have granted more visibility of our cloud applications to our system engineers and developers."
"The feature that I like best is the GUI."
"A very straightforward interface."
"Amazing reporting and tracking mechanisms."
"The product's analytics part is pretty fine."
"The interface is good."
"It is a very scalable tool."
"Its deployment is very easy and quick. Their technical support is also very good."
"It has hundreds of features and many of them are useful."
"Reporting should have more options."
"The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score."
"CloudGuard could be improved by including integration with vendors other than AWS, especially Azure, especially in permissions."
"The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands."
"Currently, worldwide, there are many companies of all sizes that do not understand the value that their data has, but even with all existing clouds, they also do not understand what the shared responsibility model is. They only assume that by having a cloud, the provider must ensure safety, when the truth is that the providers only secure their sites. Everything we do in the cloud and how we configure it is actually our responsibility."
"Scalability, particularly in workload protection, is an area that needs improvement."
"The performance can be better. Sometimes, the performance is not up to the mark. There is also integration complexity with third-party software and tools."
"Adding a feature that allows me to easily identify the changes that have been made to the CIS benchmark and update my own policy accordingly would be a valuable addition to Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management."
"There could be better integration with other solutions."
"There should be some granular custom roles that are not available. However, this is on the road map. There are many devices that do not have the Zero Trust feature and other enhancements available which they should have."
"The solution's implementations can be made much easier because, currently, it is complex in nature."
"The configuration and user behaviour analytics can be improved."
"Deployment and policy tweaking were two areas where improvement needs to be made."
"There could be room for improvement in the subscription process."
"In terms of improvements, enhancing support, particularly for OEM support with quicker response times would be beneficial."
"Lacking in local customer support."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Vulnerability Management with 64 reviews while Netskope is ranked 4th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) with 35 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Netskope is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope writes "Network proxy that provides visibility during deployment and allows you to control PII". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Netskope is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler Internet Access, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Cisco Umbrella and Forcepoint ONE.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.