We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Ivanti Connect Secure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect."
"The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
"It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues."
"Our number of users working remotely vastly increased during the COVID 19 pandemic. Check Point Remote Access VPN allowed us to quickly make the transition from in-office to remote work."
"The security of the solution is a good feature, the stability is a valuable feature, and the customization is also a nice feature."
"I found the MEP feature the most valuable. This has improved users' latency allowing the users to connect to the nearest Azure Check Point VM."
"The clients of the customers have a facility to access the enterprise network."
"To maintain the authorization of the connected user, Check Point provides multi-factor authentication for an RA VPN client to make sure legitimate users have access to resources."
"I like the host checker, which thoroughly checks the security posture of the machine before allowing access. I also like application-based access and its seamless operations."
"Pulse Connect Secure is a stable solution."
"Ivanti secures access to the corporate network from various devices and locations."
"The most valuable feature is being able to securely connect and use virtual desktops."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Pulse Connect Secure is its ease of use."
"It is customer-friendly. It is quite easy for our users to connect. There is also the flexibility of the features."
"It's quite stable."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"It's difficult to configure on Linux workstations as Check Point Remote VPN clients support only Windows and Mac devices."
"Sometimes the application slows down the computing device, and this affects workflows."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's connectivity and establishment takes time and needs to be faster."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"In my organization, there aren't Linux users, however, I know it has difficulties offering secure access for customers who use this operating system."
"For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent."
"The connection has gotten less smooth as the number of users increases. The issue is that the logs fill up quickly. Too many users are connecting remotely. It worked great when we only had a few remote connections. Now, it is disconnecting people and dropping the internet connection."
"There needs to be a way to create a VPN client specific to our environment so that we can easily lock down who can connect."
"Pulse Connect Secure could improve by having better integration with NAC solutions, such as Cisco ClearPass integration with Pulse Connect Secure. Additionally, they need better integration with Microsoft Azure AD and Azure Authenticator."
"An area for improvement in Pulse Connect Secure is the concurrent connections, particularly needing a license if you want to use Pulse Connect Secure with your Microsoft or Windows machine."
"This solution normally works but at times, we have had trouble with connectivity."
"The stability could be better. There are sometimes bugs in the system."
"The solution can be improved by addressing the failure to connect on public 2-step networks."
"The most valuable features of Pulse Connect Secure are the user-friendly connection and interconnecting."
"Zero test FDP (Fraud Protection and Prevention) should be improved."
"The product could use additional dashboards."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 62 reviews while Ivanti Connect Secure is ranked 7th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 26 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Ivanti Connect Secure is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Connect Secure writes "Beneficial multi-factor authentications, useful SSL VPNs, and simple initial setup". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Harmony Mobile and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Ivanti Connect Secure is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Ivanti Secure Access. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Ivanti Connect Secure report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.