We performed a comparison between Cisco Cloud Services Router and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It allowed us to create a more secure VPN than we would have been able to do without it."
"Overall, it is a solid product and a good router."
"The most valuable feature of the Cisco Cloud Services Router is it can make your migrations smooth. For example, if you want to migrate to the cloud, but you don't want to change the IP. You can extend your VLAN from on-premise to the cloud without having to change the IP."
"The routing service for NPLS called Layer 3-IP is fantastic."
"The bandwidth and throughput are pretty good."
"It seems pretty stable. We have never had any issues with it."
"It integrates well with the other products we're using. We have it with multiple windows like Palo Alto, Arista and it easily integrated with them."
"It handles stress very well. We have not reached a point of needing to worry about its capabilities."
"The product is easy to use."
"It offers high protection and I like it."
"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."
"In our company, we are integrators who create solutions for our customers. I find Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches to be suitable as it allows for easy configuration and offers features like SNMP. Personally, I find it convenient to switch from Cisco to Juniper EX because of my experience with various vendors like Huawei and Cisco. It's easy for me to read configurations from Cisco and transfer them to Juniper. Mainly, we work with customers who want to change or upgrade their network infrastructure, moving from vendors like Cisco, Aruba, or Huawei to Juniper for modernization. Juniper's features are more advanced, and it helps us meet the diverse needs of our customers. My role involves helping with the deployment and configuration of switching, access points, and Wi-Fi, for building robust and modern networks."
"Juniper MX Series Routers are easy to configure and easy to back up."
"The most valuable features for us were related to our transition into MPLS technology, specifically for BPN and VPN services."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"There should be a system in place to help existing users make an easier transition to the newer interfaces."
"I would like the ability to moderate between devices on-premise to off-premise. This would be a vast improvement."
"If you lose connectivity to the cloud, it is difficult to establish connectivity between hub and spoke."
"You can use this router in a scalable solution but it has its limitations."
"Technical support could be better. I am missing a single pane of glass, where I can see all the connections, etc."
"It is too complex. It is not easy to set up, even with the documentation that they provided. It is a little confusing."
"A CAPEX/OPEX model, where the pricing model is subscription-based, would give much better flexibility for the customers. The pricing and model for Cisco Cloud Services Router and other Cisco products could be improved."
"Cisco Cloud Services Router could improve the GUI."
"The solution could improve by providing enhancements to built-in SDN or SDWAN."
"In terms of what could be improved, they could extend the software warranty to be for its lifetime, as well. At the moment, the software warranty is limited, I think to one year."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"The third-level customer support coming from Juniper itself could be much better. To get assistance from Juniper, we sometimes have to wait for weeks and months. I don't really appreciate that. Their support should be faster."
"We'd like them to be capable of adding firewall options to the license."
"The solution needs to offer SDN features."
"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."
"Most IT equipment now has graphical interfaces, and there is a need for the Juniper routers to have a more intuitive web interface."
Cisco Cloud Services Router is ranked 8th in Routers with 17 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Cloud Services Router is rated 8.0, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Cloud Services Router writes "Useful for smooth migrations, high availability, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Cloud Services Router is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and Huawei Enterprise Routers, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.