We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and HPE Enterprise Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"They are the best in failover switches. Their product line is excellent."
"Most of the hardware is very stable."
"Its performance and stability are most valuable. We are using it for the last five years, and it is constantly up. It didn't create any problems for us."
"The routing platform is good."
"I recommend Cisco Routers because of its stability, support, and availability. Cisco gives premium support, and they offer a solid product."
"The stability of the solution is better than most other solutions."
"The most valuable features are stability and the initial setup wizard."
"Solution is stable."
"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."
"It is more durable than other products in the market."
"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"
"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."
"It has good scalability."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Sometimes, I find it hard to learn how some features of the router work. So, these are the issues that may arise when a user might not have knowledge about the product."
"It's an expensive product."
"The solution is difficult to implement without a broad knowledge base."
"They take too much time to reboot or restart. Whenever we hard reset them, they take time. Cisco should resolve this issue."
"Recently, there seems to be a lot of people who are leaning towards Juniper CLI, which is easier to pick up."
"There needs to be an integration with SD-WAN for the solution."
"If Cisco can give you one license and allow you to use all the features, that would be the best thing. We are using it only as a voice gateway, and there are other options available, but we need to procure licenses to use those options. We can use it as a security device, or we can use it for connecting the LAN side, but for that, we need all those licenses. They can provide one license and allow you to use all the features. This is my recommendation for Cisco."
"Longer duration of support."
"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."
"Better management tools are needed."
"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."
"The solution is expensive."
"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."
"Technical support could be better."
"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while HPE Enterprise Routers is ranked 6th in Routers with 7 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while HPE Enterprise Routers is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Enterprise Routers writes "Durable and reliable with good networking capabilities". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Juniper MX Series Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas HPE Enterprise Routers is most compared with Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches, Juniper MX Series Routers and Cisco Cloud Services Router. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. HPE Enterprise Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.