We performed a comparison between Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SSL VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN provides fast connectivity and the option to connect through multiple servers."
"The platform provides value and benefits to our organization through efficient and effective communication."
"The solution's technical support is very good."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is integrated with domain controller, SSO and MFA."
"The product is great because it is easy and simple."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is reasonably priced, and its technology is flexible."
"With Cisco IOS SSL VPN, you can access your corporate data safely and securely."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is an easy-to-use and straightforward solution."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"The platform is easy to use."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN doesn't support the configuration of multiple VPNs."
"The solution takes some time to log in because of some unavoidable security barriers, but it would be better if that could happen faster."
"The solution does not give us options if the connectivity to one server is not available."
"Cisco device management is quite difficult. They should work to simplify this."
"I would like Cisco IOS SSL VPN to provide a faster connection."
"The pricing is a stumbling block to scaling our utilization of Cisco products and we would prefer to use more of them."
"The only issue with Cisco IOS SSL VPN is on the price point. Price is an area of the solution where improvements are required."
"In addition to Cisco, we work with other solutions on behalf of our customers, such as Fortinet for FortiGate, but this latter solution can achieve the same results at a lower price."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 1st in SSL VPN with 47 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 7th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "The solution is very stable and scalable, but it is expensive, and the configuration is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Zyxel VPN Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Ivanti Connect Secure and Appgate SDP, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, AWS Direct Connect, Hillstone E-Series and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). See our Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.