We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SailPoint Identity Security Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The way we can trust this solution is the most valuable. We have no issue with this product. It is a competitive product. You need to have a very good and deep knowledge of the product to take the full benefits of all the features, but it is a good product."
"Profiling is one of the most valuable features. We have a lot of different devices between cameras, access points, and laptops that get plugged in."
"I found the CMDB Direct Connect in Cisco ISE 3.2 the most promising feature for my use case."
"I've had no issues with scalability. I started using it on two campuses, and now I'm using it across the country and scaling it across subsidiaries in other countries."
"Cisco ISE scales exceptionally well."
"One of the advantages is that you can easily find rogue endpoints. For example, if you don't want to allow any endpoints where you don't know the people plugging into what kind of devices, ISE can give you a big, clear picture, e.g., what kind of endpoints are getting connected to your network. That is one of the advantages."
"In terms of scalability, you need to factor in your licenses. With a virtual platform, the scalability is more than sufficient. We have over one thousand users."
"The interface is pretty easy to use."
"Access certification and provisioning are two of the solutions most valuable features."
"What I like most about SailPoint IdentityIQ is that it's simple to use and easy to configure and deploy."
"The compliance features are the most valuable features."
"I find the built-in connectors, lifecycle management, certification, and recertification features to be the most valuable."
"Deployment takes a bit of time, however, once it's done properly, everything becomes very organized and easy to use."
"The big one now is that they're adding AI and machine learning to figure out automated approvals and make recommendations to their reviewers. So, if I bring up Doug McPherson and it says he has access to this application, the system will make a review based on peer group analysis. That's one of the biggest new things. The problem used to be that people would get everything loaded on, and they created too much work for themselves. Now, they can use these policies and start to let the machine pick the less risky things."
"I like IdentityIQ's granular attachment management and certification customization features."
"The access certification feature is valuable."
"The user interface can be improved."
"The interface is a little bit complex."
"This product doesn't work in isolation."
"I don't like the fact that we can see the logs only for 24 hours. Maybe that happens because of the way we set it up."
"The learning curve is steep and the initial setup is complex."
"I would like for the next release to be easier to implement and to limit its dependencies around ISE, Windows, the network as a whole, etc."
"There should be a single button that can be pressed to dismiss all of the alarms at once."
"One of the issues that we used to have was with profiling because we're working with a service provider that uses a lot of bring your own devices."
"It tends to be more expensive, but at the end of the day, it works."
"The advanced provisioning features require more improvement."
"Additional details during account aggregation failures to help quick troubleshooting."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ has a primitive AI engine."
"We faced some issues while integrating the solution with a third-party tool."
"If there's a price reduction for SailPoint IdentityIQ, that would be helpful. Another area for improvement in the product is the technical support, which needs to be more friendly to customers."
"The report functionality and dashboard of the access manager could be improved."
"We have had a lot of service breaks because of the lack of support."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 138 reviews while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 62 reviews. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint Identity Security Cloud writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Cisco Secure Firewall, whereas SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.