We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"I value how Threat Intelligence integrates with the different platforms in Microsoft."
"The product provides efficient email security for sending links and file attachments."
"Its user-friendliness is its most valuable aspect."
"The product's anti-spam and malware-scanning features are useful. We scan email attachments, documents, and malicious codes."
"Microsoft collects trillions of signals from all over the world, which is incredibly valuable. It helps us identify zero-day vulnerabilities and global threats."
"You can use it to monitor third parties and ensure they are not under threat attacks. It is beneficial in the GRC model."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the insight it provides."
"The tool is managed from the cloud, because of which the maintenance is very low."
"Support must be improved."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"The software is expensive."
"Having up-to-date documentation and real-time reflections in all portals would be beneficial to keep users informed about any changes. Additionally, the frequent changes in Microsoft's UI and the movement of features between different products in the set pose difficulties."
"The solution could be more stable and precise because, at times, the threats detected are not legitimate."
"The price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the solution's price needs to be reduced."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"The price could be improved."
"I would like to see more AI features and capabilities."
"While the current setup meets our needs, Microsoft can constantly improve customization and adaptability to rapidly evolving cybersecurity threats."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 3rd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 27 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, VirusTotal, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and Splunk Mission Control. See our Cisco Threat Grid vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.