We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The security and the capabilities of the platform are the most valuable features."
"The solution also allows us to increase the power when it's too low."
"The devices are all of good quality."
"Granularity of standardization and technical controls."
"I am impressed with the tool's packet tracing so that connection with the devices is always consistent."
"Mobile anchoring and graphic user interface are helpful features."
"Cisco Wireless WAN's best feature is the integration with other Cisco products."
"Cisco Wireless WAN's best features are simple management, the cloud base, dashboards, and reliability."
"Installation is easy with seamless integration of additional APs."
"The most valuable feature is more access points."
"The solution is easy to use and flexible."
"In general, the setup process is straightforward."
"It's a well priced solution and as far as I'm concerned, it's enterprise class."
"One of the nice features is the backup version control."
"The most valuable feature of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of configuration."
"It's very easy to deploy."
"Include more managing features within the product, rather than having to purchase them as extras."
"It is expensive."
"A lot of the time, for users, it comes down to pricing. Many would like to see it be a bit less costly."
"The prices are high and should be reduced in order to be more competitive."
"The cost and support should be improved, and there should be support for the 6E standard."
"The new platform of Cisco Wireless WAN I did not like, there weren't many features available. The online platform has more options."
"Documentation is an area that needs review. It should be more dynamic and it should be easier."
"The price could be better."
"The solution needs to improve its features and offer more to the customer."
"This might not be the best solution for a very large organization."
"Tech support is mostly remote and could be better."
"The Unifi controller software has a small issue."
"The production is not very stable in our experience."
"Could be more secure and the controller more user-friendly."
"It's hard to get stuff delivered on time."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve by being more user-friendly and easy to use."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiExtender, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Aruba Wireless. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.