We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"CDH has a wide variety of proprietary tools that we use, like Impala. So from that perspective, it's quite useful as opposed to something open-source. We get a lot of value from Cloudera's proprietary tools."
"In terms of scalability, if you have enough hardware you can scale out. Scalability doesn't have any issues."
"The product is completely secure."
"The most valuable feature is that I can use CDH for almost all use cases across all industries, including the financial sector, public sector, private retailers, and so on."
"The product as a whole is good."
"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"I like the administration part."
"The model creation was very interesting, especially with the libraries provided by the platform."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric can be accessed from any namespace globally as you would access it from a machine using an NFS."
"My customers find the product cheaper compared to other solutions. The previous solution that we used did not have unified analytics like the runtime or the analog."
"It could be faster and more user-friendly."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"There are multiple bugs when we update."
"The price of this solution could be lowered."
"The competitors provide better functionalities."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
"The areas of improvement depend on the scale of the project. For banking customers, security features and an essential budget for commercial licenses would be the top priority. Data regulation could be the most crucial for a project with extensive data or an extra use case."
"Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful."
"The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release."
"HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is not compatible with third-party tools."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"Upgrading Ezmeral to a new version is a pain. They're trying to make the solution more container-friendly, so I think they're going in the right direction. The only problem we've had in the past was the upgrades. The process isn't smooth due to how the Red Hat operating system upgrades currently work."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 2nd in Hadoop with 47 reviews while HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is ranked 5th in Hadoop with 12 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric writes "It's flexible and easily accessible across multiple locations, but the upgrade process is complicated". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, Apache Spark, Cassandra, ScyllaDB and MongoDB, whereas HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is most compared with Amazon EMR, MongoDB, IBM Spectrum Computing, Informatica Big Data Parser and BlueData. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric report.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.