We performed a comparison between Cohesity DataProtect and Quorum OnQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the most valuable features is the restore functionality that they offer."
"Cohesity's web-scale architecture enables us to scale up as needed."
"We are looking forward to the next release, so we can take advantage of the AHV backup for our Nutanix environment."
"I have found that the speed of restores, especially files and folders, are extremely fast. This bodes well for us, and our end users are always amazed at how fast you can get them their files."
"Cohesity DataProtect is easy to deploy and operate."
"We can run test scripts on production data."
"A robust, verifiable backup with a restore solution, which decreases our backup and has a restore window."
"Cohesity has very simple reports to help you stay in the know of which servers are being backed up or not."
"The solution is very cost effective."
"A very high level security environment for secondary data."
"It does automated tests to the systems to make sure that you could spin them up if you needed to. And if something doesn't come back up in those tests, we get a notification saying the system didn't come back up."
"It is a stable solution."
"When it comes to recovering what you need from a backup, it's really easy. You just drill through the directory, find the file and the date that you want, and click to recover. You then pick the directory you want to save it in. Usually, it takes a minute or two and it's done. It's quick and easy."
"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."
"From a disaster-recovery point of view, one of the things I really like is that I can test the virtual copy of the physical server on a test network and compare the servers side-by-side, without interfering with the production network. So I can see and make sure that the latest copy of the server is the physical copy of the server, without interfering with production."
"It's easy to implement, easy to spin up, easily configurable, to drop-in appliances and network. There wasn't a lot of time needed to spin it up."
"Cohesity DataProtect takes hours to restore a single file, even a small one."
"I would like to see Microsoft Exchange DAG supported as soon as possible."
"They could always keep up with continuous interface refinements."
"We would love to see direct compatibility with HPE Simplivity, which we also leverage."
"We aren't missing any features. In terms of the solution overall, it's so far so good."
"Better documentation is needed because the lack of information has necessitated having our team depend more heavily on Cohesity support."
"In terms of what could be improved, it just needs some maturity."
"Initial setup can be complex if you need to change IP addresses. Hopefully, they improve that in a future release."
"I would like to see iSCSI support added so that NAS storage servers could be protected. We heavily utilize NAS storage and the risk there is minimal backup options. Currently, we are backing up NAS to NAS which is costly and slow. Being able to integrate NAS server backup would be the last item on my Quorum bucket list."
"The one thing they could do is some tweaking on the web solution that's supposed to monitor everything from one page, rather than having to bring each server up on its own webpage. It doesn't always accurately show what the system's state is at the time, and we have to restart that process now and then."
"There was a situation I faced in the past when I contacted the tool's support team, and it took them a while to respond."
"The cost could be reduced."
"They need integration with other platforms."
"The price is high and could be more competitive."
"I paid for subscription of Firewall. I paid for subscription of endpoint protection. Thet should introduce single subscription for all services."
"I don't love the scheduler, as I think that interface could use an overhaul."
Cohesity DataProtect is ranked 8th in Backup and Recovery with 69 reviews while Quorum OnQ is ranked 40th in Backup and Recovery with 21 reviews. Cohesity DataProtect is rated 9.0, while Quorum OnQ is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cohesity DataProtect writes "Easy to use, offers good scalability and responsive support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Took us just hours to do a complete server restore, with minimal downtime". Cohesity DataProtect is most compared with Rubrik, Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication and Acronis Cyber Protect. See our Cohesity DataProtect vs. Quorum OnQ report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.