We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 13 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, IBM BPM and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
