Contrast Security Protect vs HCL AppScan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Contrast Security Logo
879 views|673 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
HCLTech Logo
5,317 views|4,092 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Contrast Security Protect and HCL AppScan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Contrast Security Protect vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
ToddMcAlister
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives.""Protect provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks.""The solution has excellent real-time capabilities."

More Contrast Security Protect Pros →

"The HCL AppScan turnaround time for Burp Suite or any new feature request is pretty good, and that is why we are sticking with the HCL.""I like the recording feature.""You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI.""We are now deploying less defects to production.""The solution is cheap.""Technical support is helpful.""The UI was very intuitive.""This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

Cons
"Protect's reporting GUI is very basic. To get all statuses from the APIs, we needed to write our own KPI dashboard to provide reports.""Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration.""There's room for improvement in the initial setup."

More Contrast Security Protect Cons →

"I think being able to search across more containers, especially some of the docker elements. We need a little tighter integration there. That's the only thing I can see at this point.""A desktop version should be added.""They have to improve support.""There is room for improvement in the pricing model.""Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its features.""AppScan is too complicated and should be made more user-friendly.""We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated.""They could add a software component analysis tool."

More HCL AppScan Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives.
    Top Answer:Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
    Top Answer:Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its… more »
    Top Answer:I mainly use AppScan to secure various types of applications. I use its DAFDAT solution for black box scanning, as well as SaaS and source code validation. AppScan helps in scanning code for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    879
    Comparisons
    673
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    293
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    5,317
    Comparisons
    4,092
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    346
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Contrast Protect
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    Contrast Security is the world’s leading provider of security technology that enables software applications to protect themselves against cyberattacks, heralding the new era of self-protecting software. Contrast's patented deep security instrumentation is the breakthrough technology that enables highly accurate assessment and always-on protection of an entire application portfolio, without disruptive scanning or expensive security experts. Only Contrast has sensors that work actively inside applications to uncover vulnerabilities, prevent data breaches, and secure the entire enterprise from development, to operations, to production.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Sample Customers
    Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Contrast Security Protect vs. HCL AppScan
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Contrast Security Protect vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Contrast Security Protect is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews while HCL AppScan is ranked 14th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews. Contrast Security Protect is rated 8.4, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Contrast Security Protect writes "It provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". Contrast Security Protect is most compared with SonarQube, Fortify on Demand, Snyk, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and Sonatype Lifecycle, whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and OWASP Zap. See our Contrast Security Protect vs. HCL AppScan report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.