We performed a comparison between CoreOS Clair and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security."Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"The cloud misconfiguration is the most valuable feature."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most recent is VMDR, which provides a comprehensive overview of how to detect, patch, and remediate specific vulnerabilities."
"It is a simple solution that makes scanning easy. You just give it a scheduled task, and it will do everything for you."
"The biggest benefit is from a security operations perspective, where we are able to drive our security posture upwards by remediating any discovered vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to run different capabilities with the same agent. With only one agent, we can have EDR, vulnerability management, compliance and some basic SaaS security capabilities."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"There is a bit of a learning curve for new users."
"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."
"The resolution suggestions could be better, and the compliance features could be more customizable for Indian regulations. Overall, the compliance aspects are good. It gives us a comprehensive list, and its feedback is enough to bring us into compliance with regulations, but it doesn't give us the specific objects."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"I would like additional integrations."
"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"Qualys Container Security can improve the interface. It could be easier to navigate and be enriched."
"Improve the user interface."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"One of the biggest issues from the clients' perspective is that all Qualys computing is on the cloud."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"The reporting and the GUI need improvements."
"Improve the API speed."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
CoreOS Clair is ranked 26th in Container Security with 1 review while Qualys VMDR is ranked 11th in Container Security with 77 reviews. CoreOS Clair is rated 8.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CoreOS Clair writes "Excellent detection accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". CoreOS Clair is most compared with JFrog Xray, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
