We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and HashiCorp Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."CyberArk has a lot of modules."
"The tool has safe vaults. We keep our passwords in the Vault. The tool’s recording feature is also valuable for us."
"The most valuable feature is privileged session management."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it's the best in the market. I haven't seen any other PAM solutions better than CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault."
"The password protection itself is the most important feature. It's something we didn't have before."
"Security is the solution's most valuable feature. As far as I know, this solution is the most secure system of this class on the market today, even considering another management system like Fudo Security, which we also use. The integration capabilities are very good; it helps strengthen our overall security."
"The most valuable feature is that it is flexible. It has many connectors. that have done well, the EPV and SSH sessions are all being recorded and everything works fine."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is session recording."
"We were using it because we have compliance requirements around secret management. Having a secure vault and encrypting data was an additional requirement. When we looked at it first, we were just looking for a vault, like a lockbox. The greatest benefit of HashiCorp is its ability to manage encryption on the fly. It provides encryption of data at rest, in use, in transit, on the fly, and linked with applications, which was really attractive."
"It is user-friendly and easy to implement from any application point."
"It is an added value for our customers to have a Secrets Management workflow available that is PaaS/CaaS/KaaS Platform agnostic."
"The product is free and easy to use. It is well documented with an easy implementation process."
"The tool's dynamic rotation of the password credentials is good."
"It's stable. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
"The solution is stable. It has been working perfectly without any problem."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is the management of tickets in the pipeline."
"I would prefer that this is a fully-managed service, rather than have to manage the software ourselves and keep it up to date."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault can improve the distributive vault feature. Distributing the vault in multiple areas and multiple data centers should improve."
"I would like to see a simplification of the product."
"The architecture needs to be improved."
"I would like to see more integration with more tools, for more APIs."
"The challenge with the product is pricing since it's expensive. It also needs to improve the customization. We encountered some stability issues as well."
"Enhanced PSM support for Java based applications."
"It is complicated to deploy for Windows servers compared to other vendors."
"It would be helpful to have more advanced features."
"The documentation is very general; it should have more examples and more use cases."
"There could be a plugin for the database to change the secret automatically. It would be an efficient feature for password security."
"In my opinion, HashiCorp Vault could improve its user interface. Right now, they don't offer much in terms of a graphical interface, which means you usually have to manage things manually through API calls. I think CyberArk has a better approach because it provides a UI that integrates features across all its components, making it easier, especially for new users or those from organizations with strict licensing policies."
"I would like to see better integration of HashiCorp Vault with SAP products."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
"The product is complicated to install."
"The technical support was hard to get a hold of and lacking in service."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews while HashiCorp Vault is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Password Managers with 16 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Useful for machine-to-machine communication and has secret engine feature ". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Password Safe and LastPass, whereas HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Keeper, Delinea Secret Server and BeyondTrust Password Safe. See our CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. HashiCorp Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
