We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The solution helps our developers access internal systems. It also helps us in Privilege Access Management."
"We've written over a hundred custom connectors ourselves that allow us to do all types of privileged session management for various applications. On top of that, the rest of the API-based central credential providers allow us to get away from credentials that may be hard-coded in the script or some application."
"The solution is stable."
"There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product."
"Technical support is very helpful whenever we have any questions."
"It enables companies to automate password management on target systems gaining a more secure access management approach."
"The threat analytics is an important feature."
"The voice technology is very good."
"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."
"For users to access a system via CyberArk Privileged Session Manager, a universal connector needs to be coded in a language called AutoIT and its support for web browsers is so-so. Other products like Centrify have browser plugins that can help automate the process when using their products."
"We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process."
"The support services could act faster when people reach out to resolve issues."
"Tech support staff can be more proactive."
"We need a bit more education for our user community because they are not using it to its capabilities."
"It is very complex and difficult to set up the solution."
"There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar."
"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager could improve the integration docking, it should have more layers. For example, integration with OpenShift."
"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is ranked 12th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management writes "Enhanced security and simplified management offering a centralized solution with granular settings". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is most compared with Delinea Privileged Access Service.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
