• Home
  • DeepSource vs. Veracode

DeepSource vs Veracode comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
DeepSource Logo
DeepSource
55 views|37 comparisons
Veracode Logo
Veracode
Read 194 Veracode reviews
25,312 views|16,984 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DeepSource and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use DeepSource?
AkashKhurana
Easy to configure, stable, and good vulnerability detection
Veracode's ability to prevent vulnerable code from being deployed into production is crucial. Typically, if a dependency we use has security issues... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its complexity makes it quite expensive, but it’s all worth it, with all the engineering in the background."
  • "The pricing is pretty high."
  • "The worst part about the product is that it does not scale at all. Also, microservices apps will cost you a fortune."
  • "I think licensing needs to be changed or updated so that it works with adjustments. Pricing is expensive compared to the amount of scanning we perform."
  • "It's worth the value"
  • "Pricing seems fair for what is offered, and licensing has been no problem. All developers are able to get the access they need."
  • "It can be expensive to do this, so I would just make sure that you're getting the proper number of licenses. Do your analysis. Make sure you know exactly what it is you need, going in."
  • "The licensing and prices were upfront and clear. They stand behind everything that is said during the commercial phase and during the onboarding phase. Even the most irrelevant "that can be done" was delivered, no matter how important the request was."

    • More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
    Top Answer:SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What do you like most about Veracode?
    Top Answer:The SAST and DAST modules are great.
    Read all 96 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?
    Top Answer:The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.
    Read all 66 answers   →
    Ranking
    46th
    out of 67 in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    Views
    55
    Comparisons
    37
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 67 in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    Views
    25,312
    Comparisons
    16,984
    Reviews
    101
    Average Words per Review
    976
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    More DeepSource Competitors   →
    SonarQube logo
    SonarQube vs. Veracode
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Checkmarx One logo
    Checkmarx One vs. Veracode
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Fortify on Demand vs. Veracode
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Snyk vs. Veracode
    Compared 6% of the time.
    OWASP Zap logo
    OWASP Zap vs. Veracode
    Compared 4% of the time.
    More Veracode Competitors   →
    Also Known As
    Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect
    Learn More
    DeepSource
    Veracode
    Overview

    DeepSource is the single platform that replaces all other tools that you use to write clean and secure code. 
    Analyze every pull-request to find and fix code quality issues before you merge to master. No CI setup required.
    Prevent misconfigurations and security vulnerabilities in your infrastructure configuration. Host DeepSource on-prem or your private cloud and retain full control of your source code and privacy. 
    Automatically generate fixes for thousands of code quality and security issues with 100% reliability. Put code style formatting on autopilot with automated styling on every commit. Build integrations with other tools in your workflow using our GraphQL API and webhooks.

    Veracode is a global leader in Application Risk Management for the AI era. Powered by trillions of lines of code scans and a proprietary AI-generated remediation engine, the Veracode platform is trusted by organizations worldwide to build and maintain secure software from code creation to cloud deployment. Thousands of the world’s leading development and security teams use Veracode every second of every day to get accurate, actionable visibility of exploitable risk, achieve real-time vulnerability remediation, and reduce their security debt at scale. Veracode is a multi-award-winning company offering capabilities to secure the entire software development life cycle, including Veracode Fix, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Software Composition Analysis, Container Security, Application Security Posture Management, and Penetration Testing.

    Learn more at www.veracode.com, on the Veracode blog, and on LinkedIn and Twitter.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Insurance Company9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    DeepSource is ranked 46th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 194 reviews. DeepSource is rated 0.0, while Veracode is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". DeepSource is most compared with , whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and OWASP Zap.

    See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best Static Code Analysis vendors.

    We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.