We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that it's user-friendly."
"It is able to manage storage and use of personal passwords."
"The most valuable feature is session monitoring."
"The discovery engine is really robust and flexible. It had some session management features that are better compared to some other vendors. Overall the GUI is very good and straightforward to operate compared to other solutions. For example, CyberArk and Hitachi tend to be hard to navigate."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it provides us with a secure way of managing passwords."
"Delinea's network integration is the most useful. For example, I use a Check Point firewall connect to SmartConsole, so I need to do a lot of configuration in Delinea Secret Server. Native integration with Check Point is valuable. You can also go download whatever API you need from the cloud, whether you're using Check Point, Palo Alto, etc. Enriched discovery is another good feature. If you are dealing with several kinds of systems, you can see which system requires privileged access to my network."
"Support is helpful."
"Number one is the password vault; it's very good. Number two, they have a feature for remote desktops that are created on a per session basis, which is very good for security."
"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."
"We can use it remotely as well."
"The technical support needs improvement. For example, if you have any problems on the server configuring the IIS, they would provide you very limited details and they would tell you the problem is on your end."
"Delinea Secret Server can improve by extending the monitoring policies and making the performance better."
"The initial setup and deployment can be cumbersome."
"Although the password policy was interesting, the default setting was inadequate."
"In terms of what could be improved, the whole thing with distributed engines, et cetera, is a little bit tricky."
"We always ask for partner enablement, which is more like a soft requirement rather than a product requirement. It would be great if they can provide us deeper knowledge of their products for integration."
"Delinea Secret Server needs to improve its reporting."
"One of the things that we want is to be able to do some of the management of it using APIs."
"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."
"If you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."
"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."
"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while ManageEngine PAM360 is ranked 16th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine PAM360 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine PAM360 writes " An easy-to-deploy and affordable tool for access control monitoring". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, whereas ManageEngine PAM360 is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, ARCON Privileged Access Management, WALLIX Bastion, Fudo PAM and Delinea Privileged Access Service. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.